Tuesday, 25 June 2019
iPhones
Saturday, 22 June 2019
RI sucks.
Modern teaching
Australian teachers have higher workloads, fewer resources: OECD report
Australian public school teachers face higher workloads, fewer resources and more administration duties than global averages, according to a new international report. Despite this, they are amongst the most innovative and enthusiastic adopters of new ideas and approaches to education.
The OECD’s Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 report focuses on teachers’ work in the classroom, demographics, classroom challenges, Initial Teacher Education (ITE) and training and provision of professional development.
- Teachers in schools with high levels of socioeconomic disadvantage face greater complexity in the classroom. Consequently they have six minutes less per hour of class time available for actual teaching and learning than their colleagues in more affluent schools. This is the highest gap of any OECD country
- Less than 30 per cent of new teachers in Australia received formal or informal induction
- School time spent teaching has fallen in the last five years. Time spent on administration has increased, and is now 33 per cent higher than the OECD average
- Australian teachers spend an average of 45 hours per week engaged in work on school grounds – well above the OECD average
- 60 per cent of Australian teachers report that their professional development is curtailed by conflicts with their work schedule
- Australian teachers reported that “reducing class sizes” and “reducing teachers’ administration load by recruiting more support staff” were by far their highest priorities
TALIS says Australian teachers regarded ITE and induction processes as leaving them feeling unprepared for the classroom, while access to professional development was limited by excessive workload and inflexible schedules.
Australian Education Union federal president Correna Haythorpe said it is critically important that Departments of Education provide sufficient support to beginning teachers in these schools to enable them to do their job well and teach students despite the overwhelming pressure they are under.
“As recommended by the OECD, this includes induction programs, reduced teaching load, access to regular mentoring and secure, ongoing employment,” Haythorpe said.
“Escalating workloads impacts on teaching and learning in schools. Teachers should not be spending more time on administration than on teaching.
“Schools in socio-economically disadvantaged areas face staffing and resource shortages at a greater level than schools in more advantaged communities. It is vital that these schools have a diverse staff mix, including staff with significant experience in the classroom.
“This creates an environment where new teachers can learn from more experienced teachers and provides a collegial environment for support and mentoring, which the OECD tells us Australian teachers are striving to create despite the resource challenges they face.
Australian public school teachers are amongst the best in the world and should be part of a system which is the envy of other countries, Haythorpe said.
“Australia’s teachers are constantly asked to do more with less, leading to excessive workloads and workplace stress. The Federal Coalition Government has denied public schools $14 billion over the next decade which entrenches funding inequality in our schools for years to come.
“These TALIS findings demonstrate the critical importance of fair funding for public schools to ensure that Australian teachers have the resources to give every student the teaching and learning opportunities that they need attention they need.”
we have spent the past six years 'increasing our productivity' with a culminating rise in stress and overwork.
This is not to the benefit of children and young people at all.
Thursday, 20 June 2019
Age editorial
A fair and prosperous nation can only be built on and sustained by equality of opportunity, an unassailable principle that compels, above all, universal access to quality education from early childhood. It is, then, profoundly alarming that many students from rural and regional areas are being denied the educational opportunities available to their city-dwelling contemporaries.
Extensive research by The Age’s education editor, Henrietta Cook, and our data expert, Craig Butt, has revealed a widening achievement gap between city and country students. The performance of regional and rural schools is as much as 20 points behind that of city schools, according to NAPLAN data. Victorian year 9 regional students are a full year behind city students, and lag by almost as much in reading. Following their finding, published in recent days, that the VCE results of more than half of all regional and rural schools have declined over the past decade, Education Minister James Merlino has commissioned an inquiry. That is not necessarily a bad move, but it is an insufficient response to a fundamental flaw and must not be allowed to merely lead to yet another expensive report. Calling an inquiry is not enough in itself. The state government risks a bush backlash should it not demonstrate it is fixing the issues.
The impediments faced by rural and regional schools include: a lack of incentives to attract teachers to the regions; declining populations in about a quarter of regional areas as farms are forced to consolidate to survive; and the demoralising disincentive of the prohibitive cost of leaving home to go to university
The Age’s investigation not only ventilated the problem, but found clear elements of a solution; while there has been a general decline in rural and regional results, some schools – although fewer than one in 10 – are improving.
So, what might be done to reverse such an unacceptable situation? Increasing financial and housing incentives for teachers is crucial. The state government allocated more money in the budget to build regional schools, but it needs to buttress this with an investment in the skills and quality of the teachers outside of cities.
Mr Merlino argues schools in regional and rural Victoria have received almost double the increase in funding per student compared to city students since 2015. His advisory panel will examine how this might be better deployed. Areas for consideration should include not only enhanced staffing, but access to early childhood education and co-ordination between state and independent schools, which is providing some great results, our research found. Other parts of the solution include providing more curriculum opportunities, which would help students’ aspirations and motivation, as would financial assistance with attending university.
A recent end to a multi-year stand-off between the federal government and Spring Street will provide an extra $7 billion under the Gonski 2.0 reforms, which are designed to allocate funds on the basis of need. This adds to the state government’s record funding of schools through its ambitious Education State agenda. So, the money is there, but needs to be properly targeted. Change shouldn’t be delayed for the results of an inquiry.
Tuesday, 18 June 2019
Groan....chaplains!
Monday, 17 June 2019
FINALLY!
An expert panel has been appointed by the Andrews government to investigate why rural and regional students are lagging behind their city peers.
The announcement follows an investigation by The Age last week that revealed more than half of all regional and rural schools have recorded a slump in their VCE results over the past decade.An expert panel will make recommendations to the state government on how to bridge the divide between country and city students.
Victorian Education Minister James Merlino said while the achievement gap between rural and city students was a national problem, he wanted to take a lead in addressing the issue.
“We are already doing a lot to boost results in regional and rural Victoria, but we now need to look at what more we can do and that is why this panel is so important,” he said.
The expert advisory panel, which will be chaired by Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority chief executive David Howes, will make recommendations to the government on how to bridge the divide between country and city students.
It will include principals and regional education experts and run consultations in Ballarat, Bendigo, Horsham, Mildura, Morwell, Wangaratta and Warrnambool throughout July and August.
If it's determined by Regional Office and it probably will be then I probably won't get an invite but that doesn't matter so long as they have a good cross section and that they actually LISTEN and LEARN!
Saturday, 15 June 2019
Country education crisis.
More than half of all regional and rural schools have recorded a slump in their VCE results over the past decade, triggering concerns about a widening achievement gap between city and country students.
The figures have prompted education experts, principals and students to call for more resources for country students, incentives for teachers to leave the city and greater support for country kids at university.
Merlino caves in
State schools will receive an extra $7 billion from the Andrews government over five years after Victoria grudgingly signed up to the Gonski 2.0 funding deal.
Signalling the end of a bitter and protracted dispute, Victorian Education Minister James Merlino has finally inked a school funding agreement with the Commonwealth.
Under the plan, the federal government will inject $31.2 billion into Victorian state schools between 2018 to 2029, $30.1 billion into the Catholic sector and $18.7 billion into the independent sector.
Mr Merlino wrote to Mr Tehan on Saturday to inform him that he had signed the agreement.
“I am proud that through this bilateral agreement, the Andrews Labor government will commit to significantly increase our funding share for all schools, to ensure every Victorian school student has the best chance to thrive and succeed,” he wrote.
But Mr Merlino said he would continue to fight for a fairer model so "all students are supported to achieve their best, no matter where they go to school".
Negotiations have dragged on for more than three years, with the federal government’s contribution towards state schools' schooling resource standard seen as a key sticking point.
While independent and Catholic schools will reach 100 per cent of this benchmark, state schools will only reach 95 per cent. The Victorian government has been unsuccessfully urging the federal government to increase its share for state schools from 20 to 25 per cent.
It suspended negotiations with the Morrison government earlier this year, hoping Labor would win the federal election and pump more funding into state schools.
Australian Education Union Victorian branch president Meredith Peace said while it wasn't the agreement she had been hoping for, it would provide schools with certainty.
"We welcome the additional funding which has been provided to government schools," she said.
"Our state school kids are the lowest funded in the country, even though the Andrews government has invested heavily in schools and is closing that gap."
She said the additional funding would let schools employ more teachers and support staff, reduce class sizes and provide students with access to psychologists and speech therapists.
"It allows schools to meet the individual needs of students and that is something they struggle to do on a daily basis," she said.
Thursday, 13 June 2019
We outperform private’s
It’s often claimed private schools outperform public schools. In recent days, a media report revealed the Liberal Party candidate for the Melbourne seat of Macnamara had previously written in support of public funding of private schools. The report said the candidate, Kate Ashmor, wrote a newspaper letter in 2001 in which she said:
I was only able to attend a private school via a heavy subsidy due to the income restraints of my parents, and I firmly believe that I would never have achieved the high VCE score I did if it hadn’t been for my private school education.
But our analysis of MySchool data and Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE) results between 2014 and 2018 shows public schools have similar, or even better, VCE results than private schools with similar rankings of socioeconomic status. And these public schools achieve the results with far less funding per student.
Returns on investment
Those who argue in favour of public funding for private schools claim private schools are more efficient and academically outperform public schools.
The conservative side of politics believesthere is no equity problem to address in Australian education. The current federal government relies on conservative researchers’ evidence denying any causal link between socioeconomic status and student academic outcomes.
Read more: What the next government needs to do to tackle unfairness in school funding
Our analysis compared the results of 229 private and 278 public schools. Schools with fewer than 20 students at Year 12 were excluded, as were select-entry public schools. The analysis compared both VCE results and school-based data including funding details available from MySchool and individual school websites. The analysis took into account the socioeconomic status of the schools, using the Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA).
The ICSEA is a scale that allows a comparisonof the levels of educational advantage or disadvantage students bring to their academic studies. The average ICSEA across all Australian schools is 1,000.
In Victoria the average ICSEA is 1,031, while in Tasmania and the Northern Territory the average is less than 1,000. Schools above that figure are deemed more advantaged than those below. The school with the highest ICSEA in Victoria is Presbyterian Ladies’ College in Burwood (1,210).
There are 38 other private schools at the top of the rankings before the first public non-selective school, Princes Hill Secondary (1,156). In Victoria 318 schools are above 1,000, while those below average include only eight non-government schools, either Islamic or Catholic. The lowest ICSEA among these eight is 926 while the lowest public school ICSEA is 876.
Sunday, 9 June 2019
Yeah, we know.
It’s often claimed private schools outperform public schools. In recent days, a media report revealed the Liberal Party candidate for the Melbourne seat of Macnamara had previously written in support of public funding of private schools. The report said the candidate, Kate Ashmor, wrote a newspaper letter in 2001 in which she said:
I was only able to attend a private school via a heavy subsidy due to the income restraints of my parents, and I firmly believe that I would never have achieved the high VCE score I did if it hadn’t been for my private school education.
But our analysis of MySchool data and Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE) results between 2014 and 2018 shows public schools have similar, or even better, VCE results than private schools with similar rankings of socioeconomic status. And these public schools achieve the results with far less funding per student.
Returns on investment
Those who argue in favour of public funding for private schools claimprivate schools are more efficient and academically outperform public schools.
The conservative side of politics believes there is no equity problem to address in Australian education. The current federal government relies on conservative researchers’ evidence denying any causal link between socioeconomic status and student academic outcomes.
Our analysis compared the results of 229 private and 278 public schools. Schools with fewer than 20 students at Year 12 were excluded, as were select-entry public schools. The analysis compared both VCE results and school-based data including funding details available from MySchooland individual school websites. The analysis took into account the socioeconomic status of the schools, using the Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA).
The ICSEA is a scale that allows a comparison of the levels of educational advantage or disadvantage students bring to their academic studies. The average ICSEA across all Australian schools is 1,000.
In Victoria the average ICSEA is 1,031, while in Tasmania and the Northern Territory the average is less than 1,000. Schools above that figure are deemed more advantaged than those below. The school with the highest ICSEA in Victoria is Presbyterian Ladies’ College in Burwood (1,210).
There are 38 other private schools at the top of the rankings before the first public non-selective school, Princes Hill Secondary (1,156). In Victoria 318 schools are above 1,000, while those below average include only eight non-government schools, either Islamic or Catholic. The lowest ICSEA among these eight is 926 while the lowest public school ICSEA is 876.
Saturday, 8 June 2019
NSW Misses the point
"NSW's approach to high-potential students has been erratic" From today's SMH
This is actually an offensive statement to teachers who differentiate for the full range of their students & who are limited by a lack of State & Fed resourcing for all students.
Invest in all kids more.
Plenty of those kids are coming from homes lacking in access to medical specialists, creative & sporting opportunities, & even the basics like healthy food & winter heating.
Policies which fail to address holistic problems - the inequality in this state - are band aids alone.