Saturday, 31 October 2015
New Feminism Curriculum
Friday, 30 October 2015
Bush Bandits finished
TAFE heads say NO MORE FUNDS! to dodgy operators
Thursday, 29 October 2015
Carbonel Display
Follow-up comment from the previous post
'Privilege' breeds contempt....and it goes viral
Girl Guides
Wednesday, 28 October 2015
New ideas about creative writing
Tuesday, 27 October 2015
Sovereign Hill
Board games
Monday, 26 October 2015
Turnbull can do something....if he wants too.
A new report confirms the dismal truth: Australia’s education system has too many students and not enough funding. If Malcolm Turnbull wants to change that there’s a plan ready to go, writes Ben Eltham.
When it comes to the opportunities that top-class education can provide, you can’t get a better example than Malcolm Turnbull.
Unlike so many of his colleagues in the Liberal Party, Turnbull was not brought up in wealthy surrounds. His mother and father separated when he was nine; Malcolm was brought up by his father Bruce in modest middle-class circumstances.
But Turnbull did enjoy a first-class education, first at Sydney Grammar School (where he was a scholarship boy) and then at Sydney University and Oxford. Turnbull was always a gifted student, but he also acquired plenty of intangible benefits from his education: confidence, social connections, and a well-rounded speaking voice that would soon be put to lucrative use at the bar.
Needless to say, few Australian children of his generation enjoyed such riches of cultural and educational capital. When Turnbull attended Sydney University, tertiary education was the preserve of the lucky few; most Australians didn’t even finish high school.
In 2015, times have certainly changed. Most Australians do complete year 12, and more than half go on to university or some other form of tertiary education.
But despite the progress we’ve made in the past four decades, the old inequalities and social divides still remain. While there are plenty of precocious young minds thriving at their schools and universities, a new report by the Mitchell Institute reveals that perhaps a quarter of young Australians are being left behind. The report poses big questions about the equity of our education system, and the sort of Australian society our children will inherit.
Authored by Stephen Lamb, Jen Jackson, Anne Walstab and Shuyan Huo, it doesn’t pull punches. The numbers are consistent across the age range: around a quarter of Australian children are missing out.
The problems start right at the beginning of schooling, with many students not ready to begin prep and first year. And it continues: more than a quarter of year seven students don’t acquire basic reading skills, as shown by the NAPLAN results. By the time those children grow into teenagers, many are struggling to stay in school. 26 per cent of 19-year olds don’t have a high school certificate or equivalent. 26.5 per cent of 24-year olds are neither employed or engaged in education.
Of course, education is not destiny, and many students can catch up quickly from a slow start, given the right assistance. But it’s also true that some students can lose their way after showing early promise. The overall picture is decidedly mixed.
Who’s missing out? The answer is depressingly familiar. Those least likely to finish school are, overwhelmingly, children from poor families, from Indigenous backgrounds, and from regional and remote areas.
This inequality ramifies right through our education ‘system’ (which, as anyone who has studied Australian education policy will know, is really eight or a dozen systems – one for each state and territory, plus Catholic schools, independent schools and a riot of religious and specialist institutions).
Inequality is the driving force behind much of this. Poor students are less likely to do at well at school than students from rich families. Students with well-educated parents do much better than students whose parents didn’t finish school. Students from poor suburbs and poor regions, and especially remote and Indigenous communities, do much worse than students from the inner city and affluent leafy suburbs.
The Mitchell Institute report says that only 60 per cent of students from the poorest suburbs finish year 12, compared to 89 per cent for those from the richest postcodes. The gap is even bigger for Indigenous students: “over 30 percentage points,” according to the 2011 Census. Just 42 per cent of Aboriginal students in mainland Australia finished year 12 in that year.
If you’ve heard this argument before, that’s because it’s not new. The Gonski Review covered this in excruciating detail during the Rudd-Gillard years. It concluded that our education system needed wholesale in the way it was funded and delivered, in order to make sure the resources that we have go to the students that need them the most.
The crux of the Gonski recommendations was to give each student a guaranteed amount of funding, but then to top up funding depending on need. Indigenous students would get more support, as would students with disabilities, with learning difficulties and from poorer backgrounds.
But the Gonski reforms have withered on the vine. After some initial enthusiasm from Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard, Labor was able to implement only a small and incremental improvement in school funding, often subject to crippling negotiations with the states and territories.
Almost as soon as the Abbott government was elected, Christopher Pyne effectively walked away from the whole process, breaking an election promise.
As a result, nothing like the extra money that Gonski said was needed ended up flowing through to the neediest schools. And the rich stayed rich: independent schools and the Catholic system negotiated handsome agreements that ensured that they retained current levels of federal support. The Commonwealth now spends more on non-government schooling than it does on universities.
As the Mitchell report notes, things are getting worse, not better. It tells us that the share of government funding being directed to non-government schools has increased from 16 to approximately 21 per cent since 2001. “The growth in funding for non-government schools has far outstripped growth in enrolments,” the report points out.
Why does education matter? The answers are many and various, but they boil down to an individual’s life chances in an increasingly competitive and insecure society. While we’ve all heard the stories of PhD creative writing graduates driving Ubers, the general relationship between education and employment still holds: the higher your level of educational attainment, the more likely you are to be employed.
The latest Australian Bureau of Statistics data tells us that 80 per cent of people with a Bachelors degree were employed in 2014. This dropped to 75 per cent for those with a diploma, certificate or similar qualification, and 66 per cent for those that had finished year 12. But for those who only finished year 11, the figure drops to 46 per cent.
Of course, employment is not everything. A meaningful life can be rich in learning outside of formal schooling; a job is hardly the only measure of a fulfilling existence. We shouldn’t measure education simply by the earnings of graduates, or the sorts of workers schools and universities churn out. Huge changes in the global economy are making even highly-skilled and educated workers increasingly redundant.
But none of that should matter to the education debate, because a high-quality education should be a basic right of every Australian. A good education helps citizens in the incredibly tough labour markets of the future. It also helps governments in the form of higher tax revenues, as graduates earn more across their careers. Finally, and most importantly, education is important because it enables human beings to flourish.
If anyone should know this, it’s Malcolm Turnbull. The fine education he received helped him hone his sharp thinking skills, skills that he has variously applied to journalism, banking, the tech sector, politics and the law. Perhaps that’s why Turnbull has been so keen on saying he wants Australia to be “agile.”
The time is right for Turnbull to restart the Gonski debate. He’ll never get a better chance to give back to the society that has afforded him so many opportunities.
By Ben Eltham from the New Matilda
Federal Labor discovers rural schools
1.5 MILLION COUNTRY STUDENTS WILL MISS OUT UNDER TURNBULL PLAN
New analysis has revealed that students in Australia's regional, rural and remote towns will bear the brunt of the Turnbull Liberal Government's $30 billion cut to schools.
$12.5 billion will be ripped from 1.5 million country students under the Turnbull Liberal Government's plan, according to fresh data.
Students in regional and remote Australia should not pay the price for the Turnbull Liberal Government's broken promise on school funding.
Across all tested year levels, students from regional and remote Australia score lower in the national assessment of literacy and numeracy.
And more students drop out of school, with year 12 retention rates significantly lower in regional and remote Australia than in major cities.
Under the needs-based school funding model, around 40 per cent of additional funding would have flowed to regional and remote classrooms.
The additional funding would address the growing gap between regional students and their city peers by providing more individual attention for each student.
Even Malcolm Turnbull's colleagues have rallied against these cuts to regional schools:
"Why was I the strongest advocate across all education ministers?
I think it's because I'm the only National Party minister.
Our electorates benefit the most."
ADRIAN PICCOLI - THE AUSTRALIAN - 14 JUNE 2014
Right now, students in regional and remote areas are trapped in a lottery of location which can determine their success at school and beyond.
Labor won't stop fighting the Liberals cuts to our schools.
We remain committed to the evidenced-based, needs-based school funding model developed by David Gonski.
Labor is determined to ensure regional and remote students get a quality education because their future, and Australia's future depends on it.
Finishing Odysseus tasks
ANOTHER report on educational disadvantage
One in four Australian students fails to complete a year 12 certificate or vocational equivalent, and nearly 30 per cent of year 7 students are falling behind international benchmarks in reading.
A landmark national study by education policy think tank the Mitchell Institute has also exposed an alarming discrepancy between advantaged and disadvantaged students, and warns the gaps are widening in a "segregated" system that leaves poorer students behind.
The Educational Opportunity in Australia 2015 report, which was released on Monday, has found a staggering 26 per cent of Australian 19-year-olds, or 81,199 people, are not finishing school.
In NSW, 27 per cent (26,535 people) dropped out, while 23 per cent of Victorian 19-year-olds (17,886 people) did not complete year 12 or an equivalent.
About 40 per cent of Australia's poorest 19-year-olds are leaving school early, compared with about 10 per cent of the wealthiest.
Most socially disadvantaged students attend government schools (77.5 per cent), yet total government expenditure on private schools increased 107 per cent between 1991 and 2000.
This was more than twice the growth in funding for state schools, at 52 per cent, and far outstripped growth in enrolments.
The report's lead author, Professor Stephen Lamb, said the the effects of student disadvantage were strong in Australia compared with Canada and New Zealand.
"We haven't succeeded yet in developing an egalitarian system," he said.
"High levels of segregation of students in Australia, due in large part to residential segregation and the sector organisation of schools, tend to reinforce patterns of inequality and strengthen differences in school performance.
"We have a large proportion of kids who keep missing out at school ... it's too big a number for us to ignore, and it reflects on the quality of our system."
Students who are Indigenous, poor, and live in remote areas are falling behind their peers at major stages of their schooling.
The proportion of disadvantaged students achieving academic benchmarks was about 20 per cent lower than the rest of the population, and they were less likely to catch up later on.
Poor students also skipped a month more of school than wealthy students every year.
But disadvantaged students are not the only ones being left behind, with 28.4 per cent of Australian year 7 students not meeting international standards in reading.
The report also revealed that:
- 10 per cent of Australian students start behind at school, do not obtain a year 12 certificate or secure work in adulthood.
- One in six year 7 students who perform above benchmark standards fail to complete year 12 or an equivalent by age 19.
- 43 per cent of students in very remote areas complete year 12 compared with 78 per cent of students in major cities.
- 44 per cent of Indigenous students complete year 12 compared with 75 per cent of non-indigenous students.
- Nearly a quarter of 24-year-old Australians are not engaged in full-time education, training or work.
Mitchell Institute director Dr Sara Glover said the high number of students not finishing year 12 was a "real cause for alarm".
"This is the future workforce of Australia. If we are not equipping them well enough for that, this is a quarter of young talent wasted. For our economy, and for our future, we can't afford to do that."
Dr Glover said schools would be able to provide better support for disadvantaged students by offering more vocational opportunities.
Victorian Council of Social Services chief executive Emma King said failure to support vulnerable students, particularly in the early phase of their schooling, could severely limit their opportunities in adulthood.
"Many of these people go on to suffer financial hardship, alcohol and substance abuse, homelessness and a higher probability of ending up in the justice system."
Victorian Education Minister James Merlino defended legislation passed earlier this year, which would ensure non-government schools get at least 25 per cent of the funding given to public schools.
"This legislation simply enforced a more transparent funding model and gives certainty to the non-government school sector."
The report was "evidence" of the need for reform in education.
"We are tackling the unacceptable link between disadvantage and poor student outcomes to ensure equal opportunities for all students."
NSW Premier Mike Baird described as a "kick in the guts" former prime minister Tony Abbott's decision to cut education funding to the states and territories.
Mr Baird recently advocated raising the GST to 15 per cent as a means of increasing state education funding.
NSW Greens member John Kaye said: "The federal government is building a class-stratified NSW where the wealth of parents determines their children's education outcomes.
"It's the very opposite of a fair go, and it's the direct result of funding policies that [the Gonski funding reforms were] designed to correct.
"The only hope for breaking the cycle is the next federal government to fulfil its promise of the last two years of Gonski."
A spokeswoman for the Federal Education Minister Simon Birmingham said the government provided a "record total funding of $69.5 billion over the four years to 2018-19 – a 27.9 per cent increase across all schools over the 2014-15 baseline".
"These funds include considerable extra funds in the forms of loadings for students with disability, Indigenous students, socio-economic disadvantage, non-English speaking, location and school size," she said.
Grace Pletas, 16, dropped out of her Sunbury state school at the end of year 10, after the school would not allow her to study part-time. She wanted to take time off to treat her heart condition, and learn a trade.
Ms Pletas, who has since secured an apprenticeship, said schools should offer students more flexible study options.
"I wasn't happy at school at all. It took me a very long time to get to where I am now, and it really didn't need to."